pjm310 project management portfolio milestone

The Mod 3 Portfolio Milestone is attached for your reference. Below the Mod 5 Portfolio Milestone project due this week are the instructions for the upcoming Mod 8 Final Portfolio only as a reference and not part of this question. Below are the opening comments from the instructor. Thank you.


Hello Class,

Portfolio Milestone Assignment

Option #1 & 2: Building on Module 3’s Milestone

For this assignment, you will be capturing information that logically builds on the information from Module 3.

  1. Capture information on the logical order of the topics about which you will write, using outline form (see an example of an outline form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (Links to an external site.)). Incorporate the information you provided in Module 3 and any additional text you have developed to this point.
  2. Include one current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly source from the CSU-Global Library that you are likely to use in your final paper exclusive of any course textbooks, lecture material, or sources provided in Module 3.

As always, format your submission according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.)
(Links to an external site.)

(Links to an external site.)Good luck in Module 05 and please contact me if you have any questions.

Best wishes,

Module 5: Portfolio Milestone

  • Points 20
  • Submitting a file upload

Portfolio Milestone: (20 points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1 & #2: Building on Module 3’s Milestone

For this assignment, you will be capturing information that logically builds on the information from Module 3.

  1. Use the outline provided in Module 8: Portfolio Project to organize what you prepared in Module 3: Portfolio Milestone. Incorporate the information you provided in Module 3 and any additional text you have developed to this point. Feel free to use placeholders for the areas you will be writing about in Module 8: Portfolio Project.
  2. Add one additional, current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly source from the CSU-Global Library to the references you used in Module 3: Portfolio Milestone, and cite them all in your submission.
  3. As always, format your submission according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).

Rubric

PJM310 Mod 5 PM

PJM310 Mod 5 PM

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

This response includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

This response includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

This response includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

This response includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization

5.0 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation

Outline is clearly organized.

4.0 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Outlines is fairly well organized.

3.0 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation

Outline is poorly organized.

2.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Outline is not well organized.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style

5.0 to >4.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0 to >3.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0 to >2.0 pts Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 20.0

Module 8: Portfolio Project

  • Points 300
  • Submitting a file upload

Portfolio Project (300 points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1: Crosby Manufacturing Corporation

Read the case Crosby Manufacturing Corporation (Page 203-206) from Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management Case Studies (Vol. Fifth edition). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.csuglobal.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1502146&site=ehost-live (Links to an external site.)

  • Examine the project management issues in the case, including concerns about the project, timeline, uncertainties about meeting timelines, and consequences.
  • Overview: In no more than one page, give an overview of the case and the project management issues to be covered in more detail in subsequent sections of the paper.
  • Discuss, in a logical order, the following topics. (You must determine the logical order of these topics as this is part of your grade. See the grading rubric in this week’s folder.). Organize your work using the headings listed in the beginning of each bullet item:
    • Challenges: Judge the challenges in managing a project such as this.
    • Impact of variability: Identify the impact of variability on project completion time.
    • Alternative strategies: Argue the alternative strategies to manage the project to meet client deadlines.
    • Project schedule: Explain the expected time to finish the project, and develop a milestone schedule with all major milestones. Identify if and how the project can be completed in eighteen months. Identify three of the potential schedule-related risks.
    • Implications of diversity/culture: Analyze the implications of diversity/culture. How these implications could change if the project was being managed in an international setting.
    • Performance improvement and closure: Anticipate the consequences and recommend project management principles and tools including auditing tools important to improve project performance. In addition, specify the project closure techniques that can be used to properly close the project.

Submission

  • Write a paper addressing the Crosby Manufacturing Corporation case. Your paper should be 8-10 pages in length, not including the required title and references pages and appendices. Diagrams, charts, figures, and tables should be placed in appendices and written about in the body of the paper. For more information see “How do I do an Appendix in APA style?” (Links to an external site.)
  • Support the paper with a minimum of three current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library. This is in addition to any course textbooks or lecture material you decide to use. Of course, you may always exceed the minimum number of sources.
  • Format the paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
  • Include an introductory section clearly stating your thesis and a mapping of what you will cover; the main body of your paper; and a conclusion. Be clear, concise, and focused. As noted above, organize your work using the headings listed in the beginning of each bullet item listed above.

Option #2: Student Developed Case

As an example of what is required, read the Crosby Manufacturing Corporation (Page 203-206) from Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management Case Studies (Vol. Fifth edition). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.csuglobal.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1502146&site=ehost-live (Links to an external site.)

  • Develop your own case on project management issues including concerns about the project, timeline, uncertainties about meeting timelines, and consequences for a project on which you are or have been involved.
  • Overview: In no more than two pages, give an overview of the case including scope, cost, timeline, quality requirements, and the project management issues to be covered in more detail in subsequent sections of the paper.
  • Discuss, in a logical order, the following topics. (You must determine the logical order of these topics as this is part of your grade. See the grading rubric in this week’s folder.) Organize your work using the headings listed in the beginning of each bullet item:
    • Challenges: Judge the challenges in managing a project such as challenges in constructing the WBS, RACI, Organizational Structure chart showing who is who, project network diagram and determining the critical path.
    • Impact of variability: Identify the impact of variability on project completion times.
    • Alternative strategies: Argue the alternative strategies to manage the project to meet client deadlines.
    • Project schedule: Explain the expected time to finish the project. Identify three of the potential schedule-related risks, and develop strategies for treating the risks.
    • Performance improvement and closure: Anticipate the consequences and recommend project management principles and tools including auditing tools important to improve project performance. In addition, specify the project closure techniques that can be used to properly close the project.

Submission

  • Write a paper addressing your developed case. Your paper should be 10-12 pages in length, not including the required title and references pages and appendices. Diagrams, charts, figures, and tables should be placed in appendices and written about in the body of the paper. For more information see “How do I do an Appendix in APA style?” (Links to an external site.)
  • Support the paper with a minimum of three current (published in the most recent five years) scholarly sources from the CSU-Global Library. This is in addition to any course textbooks or lecture material you decide to use. Of course, you may always exceed the minimum number of sources.
  • Format the paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
  • Include an introductory section clearly stating your thesis and a mapping of what you will cover; the main body of your paper; and a conclusion. Be clear, concise, and focused. As noted above, organize your work using the headings listed in the beginning of each bullet item listed above.

Rubric

PJM310 Mod 8 PP

PJM310 Mod 8 PP

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Requirements

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

This response includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

This response includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

This response includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

This response includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content

60.0 to >48.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the project management concepts. Correctly represents knowledge of concepts from the readings and sources.

48.0 to >36.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts. Some errors or omissions in representing knowledge of concepts from the readings and sources.

36.0 to >24.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of project management concepts. Major errors or omission from the readings and sources.

24.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the project management concepts.

60.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critical Analysis

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides strong thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications regarding project management concepts. Able to incorporate concepts from course materials.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis regarding project management concepts. Able to incorporate most concepts from course materials.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis regarding project management concepts. Failed to incorporate many concepts from course materials.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Synthesis and Evaluation

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of project management concepts. Evaluation well supported and thorough.

32.0 to >24.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of project management concepts. Evaluation contains significant errors or omissions.

24.0 to >16.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of project management concepts.

16.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation of project management concepts.

40.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Sources

30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates three credible sources.

24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates two credible sources.

18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one credible source.

12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Application of Source Material

30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course about aspects of project management concepts linked properly to source material.

24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources and course materials as applied to project management concepts.

18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

© Copyright 2020 Urgent Nursing Writers
Open chat
Need Help? You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp +1(209)962-2652
Feel free to seek clarification on prices, discount, or any other inquiry.