please site papers seperatatly apa format

Week 2: Weekly Synchronous Session Reflection

Due:

Calendar NUR-332-Z9 (PIE) Pathophysiology (16 Weeks-D3) Fall 2019
Details

Week 2: Weekly Synchronous Session Reflection

After attending or watching the live session, pick two concepts discussed in the session that you found difficult or confusing. For each, clearly articulate what the content/concept was and note what slide the content was on. Any sources used, including your textbook, should be included as references in APA format. Next, select one of the options below, complete it, and submit by Sunday at 11:59 pm.

Option A

Using resources other than the course/textbook resources, find two NCLEX-style questions for each of the two-concepts/content areas (4 questions total) and cite where in your assigned readings the information to support each answer is. You may use “.com” websites to obtain these questions.

Option B

For each of the two concepts you identified as difficult or confusing, find a scholarly resource (video, journal article, website) that helped you better understand the topic. Cite both sources in APA format and explain the concept/content in your own words. Finally, note where in your assigned readings that content is covered. *Please note, you should not use “.com” websites for this assignment, as they are not scholarly sources. ( The two concepts are dissucused after watching Isotonic Imbalances and Hyponatremia).

Week 2 Reflecti

Calendar
Details

Week 2 Reflection: The Image of Professional Nursing

After reading the AMA statement & the Nightingale Pledge, and viewing the “Just a Nurse (Links to an external site.)” video, do you think that history has helped or hurt the image of professional nursing in the U.S.? What about the media’s role in portraying an image of professional nursing? Provide examples as appropriate. Please make sure to review the grading rubric below before completing your reflection.

Assignment Rubric Details

Rubric

true

27658

Can’t change a rubric once you’ve started using it.

Find a Rubric

Find Rubric

Discussion Rubric

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

Discussion Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post- Do you understand the topic of discussion? _6329

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

12.0 to >10.5 pts

Excellent

Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic.

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

10.5 to >9.0 pts

Good

Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic.

_7401

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.0 to >7.5 pts

Fair

Demonstrates partial understanding of the topic.

_2225

Edit ratingDelete rating

7.5 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Demonstrates little to no understanding of the topic.

_3232

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No initial post submitted.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 12.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Criteria- Did you address all assignment criteria? _2135

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

11.0 to >9.5 pts

Excellent

Meets all assignment criteria.

_2799

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.5 to >8.5 pts

Good

Meets most assignment criteria.

_3290

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.5 to >6.5 pts

Fair

Partially meets assignment criteria.

_8030

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.5 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Does not meet assignment criteria.

_9329

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No initial post submitted.

_3047

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 11.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity- Is your content clear and logical? _3675

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

11.0 to >9.5 pts

Excellent

Content is well articulated, flows logically, and facilitates communication.

_3319

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.5 to >8.5 pts

Good

Content usually flows logically and facilitates communication.

_5707

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.5 to >6.5 pts

Fair

Content is sometimes difficult to understand and may inhibit communication.

_6976

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.5 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Content is confusing and does not facilitate communication.

_5029

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

Does Not Meet Criteria

_1690

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 11.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation- Are you responding regularly to peers? _7280

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

11.0 to >9.5 pts

Excellent

Postings (4-5) are well distributed throughout the module.

_4206

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.5 to >8.5 pts

Good

Postings (3-4) are distributed throughout the module.

_1858

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.5 to >6.5 pts

Fair

Postings (2-4) are somewhat distributed throughout the module.

_8834

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.5 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Postings (1-4) are not distributed throughout the module.

_658

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

No peer responses.

_449

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 11.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Responses- Does your content have depth and build on knowledge? _5466

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

11.0 to >9.5 pts

Excellent

Postings offer substantial contributions which integrate peer comments and build on knowledge.

_4886

Edit ratingDelete rating

9.5 to >8.5 pts

Good

Most postings offer contributions which integrate peer comments and build prior knowledge.

_6578

Edit ratingDelete rating

8.5 to >6.5 pts

Fair

Some postings offer contributions but others are limited in scope or depth and do not build on knowledge.

_376

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.5 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Postings are not substantial, are often limited to statements of agreement, are incorrect, and/or do not build on knowledge.

_3070

Edit ratingDelete rating

0.0 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Criteria

Does not meet criteria

_7544

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 11.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionD

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

© Copyright 2020 Urgent Nursing Writers
Open chat
Need Help? You can contact our live agent via WhatsApp +1(209)962-2652
Feel free to seek clarification on prices, discount, or any other inquiry.