250 350 word essay hypothetically terminate counseling relationship client who has experienc
250-500-word essay, hypothetically terminate the counseling relationship with a client who has experienced trauma and abuse in the past and has now seen you, the counselor, for 8 months regarding this trauma.
- Describe the successful termination of the client relationship.
- Discuss strategies for helping the client to maintain change post-termination.
Include at least one scholarly reference in your paper.
Content |
|
|||||
20.0 %Successful Termination of the Client Relationship |
Discussion of the successful termination of the client relationship is not present or not discernible to the reader. |
Discussion of the successful termination of the client relationship is incomplete or flawed. |
Discussion of the successful termination of the client relationship is accurate and complete. |
Discussion of the successful termination of the client relationship is thorough and well-reasoned. |
Discussion of the successful termination of the client relationship is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail. |
|
50.0 %Strategies to Maintain Change Post-Termination |
Discussion of the strategies for helping the client to maintain change post-termination is not present or not discernible to the reader. |
Discussion of the strategies for helping the client to maintain change post-termination is incomplete or flawed. |
Discussion of the strategies for helping the client to maintain change post-termination is accurate and complete. |
Discussion of the strategies for helping the client to maintain change post-termination is thorough and well-reasoned. |
Discussion of the strategies for helping the client to maintain change post-termination is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail. |
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
|||||
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
10.0 %Format |
|
|||||
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
Sources are not documented. |
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error |