2 page executive summary 1

Points:

Points Range: 18 (36%) – 20 (40%)

The Executive Summary shows depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking when applying the impact of the transition from volume-based to value-based health care to the case study.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 16 (32%) – 17 (34%)

The Executive Summary fully addresses the impact of the transition from volume-based to value-based health care to the case study. Triangulation was attempted but not fully shown.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 14 (28%) – 15 (30%)

The Executive Summary lacks depth, breadth, triangulation or clarity in critical thinking when applying the impact of the transition from volume-based to value-based health care to the case study.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (26%)

The Executive Summary does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the impact of the transition from volume-based to value-based health care to the case study.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 18 (36%) – 20 (40%)

The recommendations for adjusting operations to meet value-based health care show depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 16 (32%) – 17 (34%)

The recommendations fully address how to adjust operations to meet value-based health care. Triangulation was attempted but not fully shown.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 14 (28%) – 15 (30%)

The recommendations for adjusting operations to meet value-based health care lack depth, breadth, triangulation, or clarity in critical thinking.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (26%)

The recommendations do not address (zero points) or poorly addresses how to adjust operations to meet value-based health care.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 9 (18%) – 10 (20%)

The Executive Summary is well organized, uses professional tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate level writing style. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and more than three additional scholarly sources. The Executive Summary is 2 pages plus a title and a reference page.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 8 (16%) – 8 (16%)

The Executive Summary is mostly consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and at least three additional scholarly sources. The Executive Summary is 2 pages plus a title and a reference page.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 7 (14%) – 7 (14%)

The Executive Summary is somewhat consistent with graduate level writing style and may have some spelling, and writing errors. The work is supported by the Learning Resources and less than three additional scholarly sources. The Executive Summary is not 2 pages plus a title and a reference page.

Feedback:

Points:

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (12%)

The Executive Summary is well below graduate level writing style expectations for organization, professional tone and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. The work is not supported by the Learning Resources or additional scholarly sources. The Executive Summary is not 2 pages plus a title and a reference page.